1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,000 The most amazing home video that's ever reached us here at Sightings. 2 00:00:04,000 --> 00:00:08,000 It was shot by an amateur photographer standing on a bluff above an English wheat field. 3 00:00:08,000 --> 00:00:13,000 It may be the first real evidence that crop circles are formed by extraterrestrial forces. 4 00:00:13,000 --> 00:00:18,000 Or it may be a hoax. But if it is a hoax, it's a very good one. 5 00:00:25,000 --> 00:00:29,000 Watch carefully. You are about to see the creation of a crop circle. 6 00:00:31,000 --> 00:00:33,000 This is amazing. 7 00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:41,000 If this video is genuine, it is the holy grail because we have something that absolutely proves 8 00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:45,000 crop circles are formed without human intervention. 9 00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:50,000 I can see the temptation to want to run with it and believe it simply at face value. 10 00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:54,000 But that will do all of us no good whatsoever. 11 00:00:54,000 --> 00:00:58,000 So we have to be extremely careful. 12 00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:05,000 World renowned crop circle experts Colin Andrews and Peter Sorensen were among the first to see the extraordinary video. 13 00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:11,000 They were astonished because the amateur home video seems to prove the researcher's hypothesis 14 00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:18,000 that there is a connection between crop circles and the so-called mystery lights often sighted in the same area. 15 00:01:18,000 --> 00:01:25,000 The cameraman is pointing his camera towards a wheat field into the right-hand side of the frame 16 00:01:25,000 --> 00:01:30,000 and suddenly appears two small spheres moving from right to left. 17 00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:35,000 The spheres then take a course of a semi-ring around the field. 18 00:01:35,000 --> 00:01:41,000 Suddenly in the center of the field, the central circle is formed 19 00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:46,000 and six circles on the ends of the arms are also in position. 20 00:01:46,000 --> 00:01:51,000 The third phase comes when two more spheres appear from the east 21 00:01:51,000 --> 00:01:58,000 and then the connecting pathways, the arms, drop into position. 22 00:01:58,000 --> 00:02:03,000 I must say at the very beginning I thought, wow, this feels right. 23 00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:06,000 This guy seems genuine about everything. 24 00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:12,000 And it wasn't until I began to watch it frame by frame that I began to be suspicious at things. 25 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:19,000 Sorensen is particularly suspicious because man holding the camera seems to know what will happen before it does. 26 00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:25,000 A very important thing to look for on this video is that during this key shot 27 00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:29,000 the camera seems to be wiggling a little bit like it's a handheld camera. 28 00:02:29,000 --> 00:02:33,000 If it is a handheld camera, how come he didn't follow the lights when they go off-screen? 29 00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:36,000 Instead he's already where exactly where the crop circle is going to be. 30 00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:42,000 Could someone have created this videotape using computer graphics and other special effects? 31 00:02:42,000 --> 00:02:46,000 Jim Pilatoso is an animation expert who has analyzed the video. 32 00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:49,000 There's no evidence that this is a hoax. 33 00:02:49,000 --> 00:02:53,000 I'm not saying that it's real. 34 00:02:53,000 --> 00:02:56,000 I'm saying that there's no evidence of a hoax. 35 00:02:56,000 --> 00:03:02,000 The people I've worked with in computer animation studios could do this kind of thing in about four hours. 36 00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:08,000 People are fooled by what complex and simple computers can do. 37 00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:10,000 This is like that. 38 00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:20,000 We're trying to determine like in Forrest Gump, if Forrest Gump was really shaking hands with John Kennedy. 39 00:03:20,000 --> 00:03:24,000 It's not enough to say, oh yes, it's a fake. 40 00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:26,000 Well how was it fake? 41 00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:32,000 Unlike other analysts, Pilatoso claims to have no personal bias in this case. 42 00:03:32,000 --> 00:03:40,000 When we test video, the temptation is to go into it with the presupposition. 43 00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:43,000 It's real and I'm going to find a way to prove it. 44 00:03:43,000 --> 00:03:51,000 Or the temptation is to say, it's a hoax and I'm going to prove how it's a hoax. 45 00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:59,000 What we have to do is enter into the testing to gather data and then we can draw a conclusion. 46 00:03:59,000 --> 00:04:07,000 What is certain, of course, is that the formation, the pattern we see forming on this video did appear. 47 00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:10,000 I mean it is physical. It was there in the field. 48 00:04:10,000 --> 00:04:14,000 We've seen it, measured it at ground level. We've filmed it from the air. 49 00:04:14,000 --> 00:04:18,000 It is real. That is undoubtedly true. 50 00:04:18,000 --> 00:04:23,000 But the team working with me that entered that field, they didn't like what they saw. 51 00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:27,000 They saw many footprints. They saw compression of the soil. 52 00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:34,000 They saw plants that were heavily damaged and a spiraling symmetry which was highly suspicious. 53 00:04:34,000 --> 00:04:40,000 If the tape is a hoax, Pilatoso says, it was not created with computer tricks. 54 00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:47,000 Every camera, whether home or professional, every tape deck has areas in between the frames. 55 00:04:47,000 --> 00:04:50,000 Just like in a strip of movie film. There's space in between the frames. 56 00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:58,000 In video, there's information in that space. And that information is called the vertical interval. 57 00:04:58,000 --> 00:05:07,000 There is no evidence in the vertical interval of digital processing, meaning no paint box, no computer, no tampering with the signal. 58 00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:15,000 And there is no evidence that the photographer has made substantial financial or personal gains, bolstering his legitimacy. 59 00:05:15,000 --> 00:05:22,000 What we hear is the person we assume to be the camera operator says, this is amazing. 60 00:05:22,000 --> 00:05:24,000 This is amazing. 61 00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:33,000 But when we analyze the voice, using psychological stress evaluation, this person is a little bit nervous. 62 00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:36,000 This is amazing. 63 00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:45,000 And the nature of the breathing changes rapidly as if the body was introduced to a moment of stress. 64 00:05:45,000 --> 00:05:51,000 Point of the story. It doesn't seem like this guy is lying or acting. 65 00:05:51,000 --> 00:05:54,000 Sorensen is not as charitable. 66 00:05:54,000 --> 00:06:03,000 Suddenly we clicked to this fairly tight limited motion shot and now he's saying, this is amazing. 67 00:06:03,000 --> 00:06:11,000 Now frankly, if it was me, I'd be using four letter words to make, wow, this is fantastic. 68 00:06:11,000 --> 00:06:18,000 That's what I would have been saying, but he says, oh, this is amazing. I mean, that's too British. 69 00:06:18,000 --> 00:06:27,000 But what has the photographer to gain? He hasn't made a bundle or become a media sensation. Why create such a hoax? 70 00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:46,000 This is an important tape because what you see on the tape represents either a hoax or it represents a truly significant clue, a key, a demonstration into what this means. 71 00:06:46,000 --> 00:06:57,000 There's tremendous evidence that the crop circles are very meaningful, very significant and are being made by someone other than earth people. 72 00:06:57,000 --> 00:07:12,000 I guess I want to believe Israel, but we must still, with the facts, we don't want to see a miss in the making and that is what this might turn out to be. 73 00:07:12,000 --> 00:07:18,000 The problem with the crop circle video is the same problem researchers are having with the Roswell autopsy film. 74 00:07:18,000 --> 00:07:24,000 The photographers refuse to come forward publicly. This is perhaps the strongest case for the video and the film being hopes. 75 00:07:24,000 --> 00:07:30,000 If you shot historic, legitimate footage, wouldn't you want people to know who you are?